Director Jack Sholder has revisited A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2 and now regards Freddy’s Revenge as a surprisingly solid entry in the series.
During the 1980s, New Line pushed for a quick sequel bearing the Elm Street name, not a faithful remake of Craven’s film. Sholder says there was no external pressure to deliver a blockbuster; his own aim was to make a strong movie and keep Freddy dark in both visuals and mood.
Charting a different path for Freddy
The follow‑up explored new angles for the character, supported by a distinct visual language. Its decision to have Freddy cross into the real world sparked controversy, but it also set the film apart within the franchise.
A shift in how fans view Elm Street 2
Over time, talk around the movie’s subtext and its place in the saga drew a broader audience. Retrospectives and Mark Patton’s documentary work helped clarify intent behind the screenplay and performances. A 30th‑anniversary screening and a 4K restoration with Dolby Atmos rekindled interest and offered Sholder a fresh perspective.
With the restoration complete, Sholder now sees the film as a meaningful chapter in the Elm Street saga. He still holds Craven’s original in high regard, but he accepts that Elm Street 2 earned its standing and will be part of his legacy.
Source: Original article
